Monday, October 5, 2020

FRENCH IRIS FROM THE PAST NAMED AFTER LADIES

By Sylvain Reuad


To name an iris after a real person (I think it is the same for other flowers) one must follow special rules. As part of the process, it is necessary to attach to the registration request a signed consent of the named person when she or he is alive. It was less formal in the 1920s and 1930s, and hybridizers of the time did not hesitate to pay homage to some notable or some friend or acquaintance, in particular as a gallantry to a lady! Just in the list of varieties registered by Ferdinand Cayeux, I noted 22 names of varieties dedicated to one particular lady. His colleagues Denis and Millet followed the same policy and several of their varieties bear the name of a lady of their time; they are either a few members of their family, or the wives or daughters of notables to whom they wish to pay homage. The only exception was Philippe Vilmorin, perhaps to stand out from competitors!


A large number of these varieties can still be found in specialized gardens and in the collections of a few individuals who are passionate about historic irises.


Starting with the selections of Jean-Nicolas Lémon, otherwise known as Lémon fils (son). One of the very first dedicated varieties is 'Julia Grisy', an indigo plicata on a bluish white background which is described as follows in the Annals of the Société Royale d'Horticulture de Paris in 1842: "Narrow foliage, medium flowers, petals exterior (1) wide, streaked with purplish blue, largely bordered with white ”. 

Neither the person to whom it owes its name nor this flower has survived the wear of time. This is fortunately not the case of 'Madame Chéreau' (1844) which is one of the selections of JN Lémon still present in many gardens and considered the most important iris of his lines. The Bulletin of the General Circle of Horticulture of 1845 gives a delightful and time-bound description of it: “Your Commission noticed in the seedlings of Mr. Lemon charming gains; she examined them with scrupulous care; and, wishing to describe some of them to make them known to you, she found herself embarrassed over the choice to be made since all the varieties were remarkable; nevertheless forced to rule, it opted in favor of six of them, to which a serial number was applied.

The number one was a beautiful white background, bordered with blue streaks; the outer petals roughly the same color, but the streaks do not extend to the edge; it is thus trimmed with a beautiful white ribbon which gives this flower a cheerful appearance. She is worthy of a distinguished patronage, so we called her 'Madame Chéreau'... ” Lady Chéreau was none other than the wife of the director of the Royal Horticultural Society.

Among the many selections of JN Lémon there are several varieties with ladies' names, which are now forgotten: for example,' Duchesse de Nemours' (1848),' Madame 'Rousselon' (1842), 'Amélie Mairet' (1845 ) or another celebrity, 'Victoire Lemon' (ca 1845), also called 'Madame Lémon'.


A little later, around 1860 and until the end of the century, it was the Verdier family who took up the torch for the cultivation of irises. The custom of giving a variety the name of a lady is still respected, and among the dedications of the Verdier family there is a curiosity, 'Sister Superior Albert.' There also was (one iris that we only know the name and variety, that survived to the present day), called 'Madame Louesse' (1860).

There was also one of Ferdinand Cayeux's first varieties called 'Madame Blanche Pion' (1906); it is an amber yellow variety on a purple base, perhaps extinct. But other varieties less known are:

'Jacqueline Guillot' (1924), lavender blue:



'Charlotte Millet' (1927), purple:



'Geneviève Serouge' (1932), pale blue, infused with primrose yellow:



'Madame Ulman' (1936), lilac and purple:



'Anne-Marie Berthier' (1939), white:



'Marie-Rose Martin' (1939), yellow centered in pale lilac:



There is also a rather mysterious plant, which is known only by its offspring: 'Clémentine Croutel' (ca 1925) (2).

The colleagues of Ferdinand Cayeux did not stay behind on this subject. The Millet family, such as Armand, Alexandre then Lionel, were active in the interwar period. They were the creators of:

'Mady Carrière' (1905), two tones of light mauve:



'Yvonne Pelletier' (1916), light orchid pink marked with yellow on the shoulders;

'Simone Vaissière' (1921), lavender blue neglecta:



'Madame Cécile Bouscant' (1923), pink orchid; 'Germaine Perthuis' (1924), luscious purple:



but their greatest achievement is certainly the famous purplish blue 'Souvenir de Mme Gaudichau' (1914).


As for Fernand Denis, missing in 1935, the SNHF bulletin of 1935 said in his obituary chronicle about him: "In a long series of years, he tried to improve the irises of the gardens by using for his hybridizations the I. Ricardi of Palestine. “ He therefore introduced tetraploid irises to France. In the area that concerns us today, we owe him, among other things:


'Mademoiselle Schwartz' (1916), lavender blue:



'Madame Chobaut' (1916), pink plicata:



'Edith Cavell' (1921), white strongly marked with yellow on the shoulders:



'Andrée Autissier' (1921), sky blue.

Many other varieties could be mentioned bearing the name of ladies recorded during those years when French irises had the reputation of being among the most beautiful in the world. If the misfortunes of the Second World War interrupted their glory, they gradually reclaimed it from the 1960s. And the tradition of giving ladies' names has continued unabated, and has spread throughout the world.

(1) The sepals of the flower are thus designated.

(2) Two descendants of 'Clémentine Croutel' are advantageously known: 'Nêne' (1928) and 'Hélios'


Monday, September 28, 2020

Photo Essay: Historic varieties from 1934

by Mike Unser

A selection of varieties I have grown that were introduced in 1934. New gene combinations from the previous decade were giving a wide range of novel forms, colors and patterns. The economic depression of the 1930's era was hard on the people of so many countries. Perhaps the need for hope and beauty fueled the innovation and creativity of these golden years for irises.
























What are you growing from 1934?

Monday, September 21, 2020

Spring is in the air in New Zealand

by Maggie Asplet

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly it comes around to my turn to write.  Just about got caught short when I suddenly remembered I need this for Monday morning. Just as well we are a day ahead of my American friends.

I must say, it has been a very troubling time for us here in New Zealand, worrying about our friends and the horrific fires you have had in some areas.  Thank goodness for being above to make phone call to check you are all OK.

I certainly hope that the fires are more under control now than they were a week ago.

As you now head towards you colder month, we are moving through Spring and towards our Summer.  Yay.

My excitement is building as this will be the first flowering of my seedlings.  This is from crosses I did mainly at Thomas Johnsons, Mid America Iris Garden in 2018.  Sadly, all the seed that Thomas sent from 2019 was destroyed by our MPI people, an error they said, so I will not have any from that work, and with COVID19 who knows when I can return.

\

Seedlings are putting on good growth, just in the process of putting out the watering system now.  It is starting to get very dry and our overhead water had iron in it and marks the plants badly.

These first few sets of images I will show you are Standard Dwarf Bearded (SDB's) irises, that have been successful, and I am now waiting with baited breath for the outcome.  I will post images of the outcomes in the next article for you all to see how well (or not so well) I did.

Alaia by Thomas Johnson'18

Kerpow by Thomas Johnson '18

From this cross I had only 1 seed from 22 germinate but I'm very happy to say it is growing well and hopefully will be flowering soon.

My second successful cross with the SDB's was Slightly Tipsy X Kerpow.  This cross I have done both ways and was successful with both.  It will be interesting to see the differences with the new cultivars.

Slightly Tipsy by Paul Black '18

It is fair to say, that I did many crosses that did not set any seed at all, which is probably just as well, as it would have been a daunting task planting more than what I had.

Another successful cross has been Color X Kerpow.  Interesting to note there were 71 seeds but only 2 germinated.  Two is just fine by me.

Color by Paul Black '18

I would like to point out that I spell colour differently, and have to think twice when I type the name of this cultivar.  I automatically want to correct it.  Sorry Paul.

The next successful SDB cross was Love Spell X Peppito.  58 seeds arrived and 13 germinated.
Love Spell by Paul Black '10

Peppito by Paul Black '16

Another cross using Peppito was with Stylish Miss.  This was done both ways but with success only in the Stylish Miss X Peppito.  Not a lot of seed, just 12 and 7 germinated.

Stylish Miss by Thomas Johnson '17

I then crossed Stylish Miss with Lovable Pink, again a very successful cross producing 64 seeds of which 45 germinated.  So one would hope there is something great from all of those.

Lovable Pink by Paul Black '13

The last of the SDB's that I will showcase now is a cross between Carrot Flash X Eye of the Tiger.  26 seeds, 13 germinated.

Carrot Flash by Paul Black '17

Eye of the Tiger by Paul Black '08

So, if I don't have anything of much interest from these, then I will be very surprised.  By the time comes for me to write again, hopefully it will be to show you the outcome of some of these crosses.

A very big thank you to both Thomas Johnson and Paul Black for allowing me to annoy them so much and so look forward to when it is possible to return.  I so miss seeing all my 
American friends.

Please take care at such uncertain times, stay well and stay safe.



Monday, September 14, 2020

Progress with Arilpums

by Tom Waters

When I wrote my previous blog post on arilpums early in 2019, I had to focus mostly on history and theory, as I did not yet have much to show from my own seedlings. That has now changed, and the current state of this project is even better than I had dared hope.

As explained in the previous post, arilpums are arilbreds dwarfs that come from crossing pure arils with the dwarf bearded species Iris pumila. If the aril parent is a tetraploid, theory says the resulting arilpums should be fertile amphidiploids, a sort of arilbred analog of the SDBs. They thus have the potential of ushering in a whole new "fertile family" of miniature arilbreds.

Waters Q025-01

This spring, I bloomed two arilpum seedlings, both prolific two-year-old clumps covered in bloom. The first, Q025-01, from 'Merlin's Magic' (a selection of Iris stolonifera) x P002-05, a pumila seedling of Armenian origin, has a dainty Regelia look and some nice veining. The second seedling, Q053-01, from 'Tadzhiki Bandit' x 'Sudden Butterflies' is larger and huskier, with flowers reminiscent of tall arilbreds with Regelia ancestry, such as 'Stars Over Chicago' or 'Saffron Charm'.

I also had good bloom this year on an arilpum seedling from

Waters Q053-01

George Hildenbrandt, GH-11-4-2, from 'Dunshanbe' x 'Hidden Dragon'. This is a charming dark arilpum with nice aril-like flower form.

Hildenbrandt GH-11-4-2

The remarkable thing is that all three of these seedling produced seed for me this year when crossed with other arilpums. In my previous post, I mentioned that earlier hybridizers working with arilpums had found them to be infertile as pod parents. That is clearly (and thankfully!) not a general rule! Here are my successful arilpum x arilpum crosses this year:

Q053-01 x Aladdin's Gem gave 38 seeds
Q025-01 x Q053-01 gave 9 seeds
GH-11-4-2 x Q053-01 gave 23 seeds
GH-11-4-2 x Aladdin's Gem gave 3 seeds

These are not huge seed yields, but they are certainly adequate for continued breeding. I am quite optimistic that a number of the second-generation seedlings from these crosses will be fully fertile, and it will be possible to line breed arilpums without having to constantly go back to the difficult aril x pumila initial cross. This will also open up arilpum breeding for hybridizers who live in areas where either arils or pumila are difficult to grow.

Next spring should offer even more excitement, as I have more than 30 arilpum seedlings from various crosses that will be blooming as two-year-old plants. I got a sneak preview of one this spring,  Q066-08, from 'Tadzhiki Bandit' x P018-02, a pumila seedling originating from the Caucasus mountains. It looks for all the world like a miniature rendition of its aril pod parent, giving a rather more "onco" impression than others mentioned in this post. It has not yet been tested for fertility.

Waters Q066-08

All this has been an exciting vindication of a breeding project motivated mostly by theoretic possibilities rather than concrete experience. I'm now confident that arilpums have a bright future ahead.